Author:Klaus Radermacher

Keyphrases

2D-3D Reconstruction, 3D ultrasound, Accuracy, Active kinematics, Additive Manufacturing, automatic analysis, automatic contact gel application, Biomechanical Modelling, Biomechanics⁶, Bone, bone pin, bone–implant interface, bony impingement, challenge, closed loop control, CNN², communication standard, completion, Component alignment, Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery, computer assisted surgery, Convolutional Neural Network², CT to EOS matching, cup orientation, Dashboards, deep learning, Digital Operating Rooms, dislocation³, endoprothetis, ESOP, EtherCAT, Extended SOP, External Fixation, external fixator, extrapolation, fixateur externe, functional anatomy, gender, Geometric Parameter Analysis, handheld device, Healthcare, HIP⁴, Hip joint center, hip score, HMI, human-machine interaction², Human Risk Management, IEC 62366-1, IEEE 11073 Communication Standard, IEEE 11073 SDC², iliopsoas, image-based planning, image segmentation, Impingement, Implant Design², Instrument guidance, Instrument guide, Integrated Operating Room², Integrated OR Solutions, interbone parameters, Interoperability, Intraoperative Workflow Optimization, ISO 14971, ISO IEEE 11073 SDC Standard², J-curve, J-Curves, kinematics, knee⁹, knee alignment, knee morphology², Knee Testing Rig, laminectomy, Landmarks, low-resource, machine learning, mathematical models, medical robotics, Model Completion, modelling, modular medical device, Modularisation, morpho-functional correlation, morphology³, motion analysis, multi-view segmentation, Multibody Simulation, Navigated Control², networked operating room, Open Integrated OR Systems, Open Networked Systems, Open Standards, Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy, operating room network, optical tracking, OR.NET initiative, OR.NET RT, Orthopaedic robot, Orthopaedics, over-/underhag, Patella, patellofemoral morphology, patient-specific⁴, Patient Specific Implants², patient-specific THA, pedicle screw, pelvic tilt³, pneumatic muscle, position control, Pre-operative planning², preoperative planning⁴, Preoperative Templating, Principal Component Analysis, proximal femur, psoas syndrome, quality assurance, range of motion³, real-time communication, real-time control, registration², Resultant Tibiofemoral Force, resulting hip force, risk management, robotic ultrasound, robotic ultrasound system, Robotics, Safe Zone², Scaphoid², SDC, SDC Workstations, Segmentation⁵, semi-active, semi-automatic, Semiactive, sensor integrated, Service Oriented Architecture², Service Oriented Device Connectivity³, shoulder joint simulator, side-to-side asymmetry, Smart Instruments, Smart Screwdriver, sonography³, SOP, Spine surgery, SpinePilot, Standard Operating Procedures, standing position, statistical analysis, Statistical Shape Model³, statistical shape models, stem orientation, Surgical Checklist, Surgical Cockpit, surgical monitoring, surgical navigation, target zone³, THA⁴, THA planning², Tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance, tibiofemoral morphology, TKA, Tool guidance, Tool guide, total hip arthroplasty³, Total knee arthroplasty⁸, Tracking², tracking system, Transfomer, Trochlear Groove, Tuberositas tibiae, UI Profile, Ultrasound⁸, Ultrasound imaging, ultrasound scanning automation, Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty, Universal Foot Switch, Universal footswitch, Usability Engineering, User Interface Profiles, Weight bearing, workflow management, workflow optimization.